Written inside the pages of Canada’s criminal code are things that are so antiquated, they no longer have relevance in today’s society. So, that which doesn’t hurt you should just remain, right? Perhaps not. There are many laws with wording that might end up unwittingly hurting a Canadian citizen if taken literally. With over 1200 pages, the criminal code has been revamped, added to, and overruled many times. But what it has never been is looked through, to discover what makes sense in the here and now and what doesn’t – up until recently.
Last week the penal code got an upgrade. Many sections are wildly out of date and context, but the one targeted last week was Section 71, which prohibits you from challenging anyone to a duel. If you do, apparently you can face up to two years in prison, which is not the only reason why the practice disappeared. It was likely a factor back when it was something Canadian citizens considered. The upgrade is not just about a duel invitation being overhauled, though. Section 365, which stops anyone from “pretending” to practice witchcraft, has likewise been stricken from the books. So for all those out there who want to have an old-fashioned duel or to take out the book of spells, you are once again free to do so.
Also allowed are “crime comics,” which were banned after World War II for inciting youth delinquency. If that law was used today to guide the media, then there would likely be many people on trial for comic heresy. So, who is responsible for finally coming to common sense and starting to take a look at all the unnecessary things that are clogging up the Canadian criminal code? Jody Wilson-Raybould. Her proposed bill C-51 (not the same as the terrorism bill) lifts the prohibitions placed on:
- Duels of any kind
- Giving thieves a reward for returning stolen goods without any questions asked
- Slanderous remarks about religion or blasphemous libel
- Pretending to engage in witchcraft
- The issuance of trading stamps
- Taking an exam for someone else under false pretenses
- Claiming that you are a royal warrant so that you can advertise that you have the monarchy’s permission to produce goods
Mostly stemming from the Colonial days, none of the above laws that would hold up in today’s criminal court. Some of them have already been struck down by the Supreme Court and declared unconstitutional.
This isn’t the first time that legislators have attempted to bring the Canadian criminal code into the here and now. Last year the federal government took steps to change gender-charged language and legislation that discriminates against a specific sexual preference. The legislation was introduced last year to repeal the anal sex consent age due to the fact that it unfairly singled out the homosexual population, and therefore was a means to discriminate.
So what is so harmful about antiquated laws?
When laws are in the criminal code, they are still the law, regardless of whether they are relevant or not. One example is how Canada has had to revamp rape laws to shield the victim; legislators made it illegal for a victim’s past sexual history or promiscuity to be a part of the trial. Currently, you can’t make anything about the victim’s sexual history admissible to a rape trial to prove consent, as you could in the past.
There is no argument that going through the entire criminal code would be arduous at best, and likely completely impossible. Most of the laws that no longer apply have been challenged and overturned in the courts. But if someone were really looking, it might be possible to use the criminal code of the past to prosecute future defendants in an unfair way.
As times change the laws pertaining to Canadian society have had to change with them. The problem is that you can’t rewrite history, nor can you just take a criminal code and scrap it for a new one. Within the deep recesses of the penal code are the ideas not just of legal scholars, but Canadian society at large about how to treat people with respect, grant them true constitutional rights, and undo things that were once harmful but accepted. So for all of you out there who have had money stolen, feel free to hire the best criminal lawyer without any questions asked for your money being returned – it is legal once again!
Every year, about 41 million Americans earn themselves a speeding ticket.
Keep in mind, speeding is not the only traffic violation. If you run a red light, drive without a valid license, hit the road when impaired, drive a vehicle with burned-out headlights or fail to yield, you’ll be guilty of a traffic violation.
While some violations are less serious and fairly straightforward to resolve, others – like DUI and hit and run – are serious and can get you behind bars.
If you’re being charged with a traffic violation, it can be tempting to fight the charge alone. Don’t.
Here is why you should hire a traffic violation lawyer.
1. You Don’t Understand Traffic Law
Sure, traffic laws aren’t the most complicated, but that doesn’t mean just about anyone can understand them.
If you’ve violated a traffic law, now is not the time to start researching the specific law and the potential consequences. You’ll be too distraught to understand anything.
On the other hand, hiring a traffic lawyer gets you a competent professional with an in-depth understanding of federal laws and state and local traffic codes. The lawyer has probably spent several years defending clients in traffic courts, so you’ll feel confident having them on your side.
They will evaluate the case brought against you, identify weakness and aggressively fight the ticket on your behalf.
Can you imagine cross-examining a police officer by yourself in a traffic court? No way! A traffic violation lawyer has the skills to question the officer with the aim of raising reasonable doubt as to your guilt.
2. Dismiss/Lower Ticket Penalties
Did you know Americans pay north of $6 billion worth of speeding tickets annually?
This is a huge amount. It means when you get a traffic ticket, you’ll certainly have to pay a fine.
If you’re a first or second-time offender, it usually seems easier to settle the fine and move on with your life. But here is the thing, some tickets are wrongly issued, and others can quickly add up. A $500 speeding ticket, for instance, can hurt your bank account.
For those reasons, the best thing to do is to hire a traffic violation lawyer. He or she can contest the penalty, or explain your circumstances in a traffic court and get the judge to lower your penalty or even dismiss it entirely.
Obviously, getting a lower fine is good for the wallet, but there is more to it. When a penalty is dismissed, you typically won’t accumulate points on your driving license. The outcome is your DL won’t be suspended.
3. Gathering Evidence Information
You’re very certain you didn’t skip a red light, but here you’re slapped with a red light ticket.
Who is right? Who is wrong? The only way to establish the truth is to contest the ticket.
If your state or local authority has installed traffic cameras along the road you were on, it’s possible to collect the footage or incident reports.
The problem is, as a regular person, you might even not be aware that you can get video footage. And if you are aware, bypassing the typical bureaucracy of public offices can prove challenging.
The best thing you can do in such a situation is to hire a traffic violation lawyers.
These professionals know their way around bureaucratic government offices and can easily gain access to the video footage. Needless to say, if the footage proves you didn’t run a red light, the lawyer will ensure the ticket is dismissed.
You can even instruct the lawyer to sue the traffic officer for writing a false ticket.
4. Get Alternative Discipline
The vast majority of traffic offenders are usually guilty as charged.
Although hiring a lawyer enhances your chances of getting a reduced penalty, this is not always the case. If the prosecutor has substantial evidence against you, there is little a lawyer can do.
However, depending on your record, a competent lawyer can be able to negotiate an alternative discipline.
A common alternative to a fine or suspended license is attending driving or traffic school! Well, going back to school is not an interesting prospect, but would you rather lose your license or pay costly fines?
5. Save Money
One of the primary reasons traffic violators don’t hire lawyers is cost. They often wrongly assume it’s cheaper to settle a fine or serve a probationary period than hire an attorney.
It’s true, routine violations don’t need a lawyer, especially if you’re a first-time offender. But when you’ve committed a serious offense, you shouldn’t fight the charge alone in a bid to save money. You could actually end up spending even more money.
If you lose the case, for instance, the violation will show up on your driving record. The more points you have on your record, the higher the premiums you’ll pay for auto insurance.
A lawyer can ensure the violation isn’t added to your driving record, thereby preventing you from higher insurance premiums.
Beyond saving money, you’ll also save time. For a small fee, a traffic violation lawyer will handle all the paperwork on your behalf, and represent you in a traffic court where necessary.
Hiring a Traffic Violation Lawyer Is the Right Step
As a law-abiding citizen, it’s never your intention to violate a traffic law. However, sometimes circumstances beyond our control lead us into legal trouble.
If you’re facing a traffic ticket or charge, you could be tempted to contest or fight it on your own, but as we’ve demonstrated, it’s not a risk worth taking. Hiring a traffic violation lawyer gives you the best chance of getting the ticket penalty reduced or dismissed.
Don’t waste any more time. Find a lawyer today.
In a land mark ruling in July of 2017, the Michigan Supreme Court convicted a man of DWI for operating a motor vehicle in your own driveway. The police can actually come in, investigate and arrest an individual for driving while intoxicated within their own property.
Leverson Budke Criminal Defense
295 Marie Ave E #240
St. Paul, MN 55118
In the case of the State of Michigan v. Gino Roberto Rea, the defendant was found guilty of driving while intoxicated, even though he was in his car on his own driveway. Gino Roberto Rea’s case was thrust into the spotlight in 2014 when neighbors complained to the police at least three times, about noise that was coming from his property. In response to the complaints, an officer visited his premises and found Rea intoxicated and attempting to back out of his garage. Even though he reentered the garage, the officer arrested him and was later found to have three times the legal limit of alcohol in his blood.
The reason for his arrest was that he had been operating his motor vehicle while drunk, leading to the question of whether an individual can be arrested for DWI while stationary within their own driveway. According to the Michigan Vehicle Code section 257.625 (1), it is unlawful for a person to operate a motor vehicle on a highway or any place that is accessible to the general public and to other vehicles including designated parking areas while intoxicated.
When Rea’s case was first taken to court, his lawyer filed a motion stating that because he had been drinking and driving within his property, he did not break the law. The judge agreed with this motion and dismissed the case. However, the case was taken to the Supreme Court of Appeals under the argument that Rea’s driveway was well within public access and thus it was unlawful for him to operate his vehicle on his driveway while intoxicated.
In the case of the State of Michigan v. Gino Roberto Rea, the fact that the defendant’s property was within access to the public and other vehicle users, prevailed over his right to operate a motor vehicle in the property while intoxicated. According to the prosecutor, there was no barrier between the street and Rea’s driveway to prevent other motorists from accessing the driveway. As a result, Rea was found guilty of operating his vehicle while intoxicated in an area where he could endanger the lives of other motorists.
This ruling is not a law to say explicitly that operating a vehicle in one’s driveway while intoxicated is unlawful. However, it sets precedence to show that just because you are in your driveway, you are not exempt from being charged with a DWI especially when you endanger the lives of the public and other motorists.
Minnesota law on DWI prohibits operating, driving and being in physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, drugs or other intoxicating substances. The law does not create a boundary between private and public property but uses the criteria of whether these areas are accessible to vehicle use or not.
The trial of celebrity and football legend O.J. Simpson in the mid-90s was a big media affair. After the murder of Nicole Brown Simpson, Simpson’s ex-wife, and her friend Ron Goldman, Simpson arranged a strong legal team to back him up and ensure his acquittal. Millennial people, who were born after 1995 and even after 2000, are curious about how Simpson got away and who his lawyer was. Find out all about Robert Kardashian, the lawyer for Simpson.
Who is Robert Kardashian?
To the millennial people, Robert Kardashian is now famous as the father of celebrities and global heartthrobs Kim, Kourtney and Khloe Kardashian. But the 90’s saw him as a celebrity on his own right. He began his career in the late 1960s as a lawyer. Soon, he got involved in various business ventures, including a few of O.J. Simpson – who was his friend. When Simpson was arrested after a spectacular chase and charged for the murder of his wife and her friend in 1994, Simpson appointed Kardashian as his lawyer.
Birth and Early Life
Robert Kardashian was born in 1944 to Armenian-American parents, who ran a profitable meat-packing business. He grew up in L.A, and had his early schooling from the Dorsey High School. He earned a degree in business administration in 1966 from the University of San Diego.
Kardashian worked as a lawyer for almost 10 years before he concentrated on business. Along with another investor and his brother, Robert set up a trade publication called Radio & Records in 1973.
His Relationship with O.J. Simpson
It was around 1973 that he met O.J. Simpson, a football star of that time, and developed a friendship. The friendship soon turned into a professional relationship, with the two setting up a music video company and a frozen yogurt shop.
Simpson soon became a family friend. Robert Kardashian married for the first in 1978, and from his first wife Kris he had his first daughter Kourtney Kardashian in 1979. The following year saw another daughter Kimberly Kardashian being born. The couple spent time with Simpson and his wife Nicole Brown who was his girlfriend at that time. Soon, the Kardashians welcomed son Robert Jr. and another daughter Khloe Kardashian. The Simpsons married in 1985 and had two kids, Sydney – a daughter and Justin, a son.
Kardashian stood by Simpson during his 1995 trial, and worked with other lawyers F. Lee Bailey, Shapiro and Johnnie Cochran to fight prosecutors Christopher Darden and Marcia Clark during the long trial. The face-off paid off, with Simpson being acquitted of murder charges in October by the jury.
If you’re in need of a criminal defense lawyer contact the attorneys at: https://www.leversonbudke.com/minnesota-legal-services/mn-dwi-lawyer/
Souring of Relationship and Fallout
Following Simpson’s acquittal, the relationship between the two once-close friends soured. In 1996, Robert Kardashian mentioned to ABC News that he was suspicious of the innocence of Simpson. He clearly said that he had doubts with the blood evidence. He also told this to author Larry Schiller in an interview for the latter’s book “American Tragedy”, which analyzed the trial and defense team of Simpson.
Robert Kardashian died in 2003 due to esophageal cancer.